Clinical Trials

Ketamine and ECT in Treatment-Resistant Depression

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of ketamine versus electroconvulsive therapy in managing treatment-resistant depression.

Published August 06, 2026 Read 1 min 254 words By The Psychedelic Journal

Ketamine and ECT: A Comparative Overview

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) presents significant challenges, persisting despite multiple antidepressant trials. Recent research highlights ketamine's non-inferiority to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in non-psychotic TRD cases, with both treatments rapidly reducing suicidal ideation. However, ECT remains more effective in severe episodes with psychotic features.

Mechanisms and Context

Both ketamine and ECT induce neuroplastic changes, such as increased brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and hippocampal neurogenesis. They also modulate the adenosine-mediated purinergic pathway, contributing to their rapid therapeutic effects. These mechanisms highlight the importance of neuroplasticity in addressing TRD, offering insights into why traditional antidepressants may fail.

Policy and Research Implications

The findings underscore the need for individualized treatment plans and structured maintenance protocols. Policymakers and clinicians should consider the phenotypic heterogeneity of TRD when designing treatment strategies, as the presence of psychotic symptoms significantly alters biological responses. The identification of adenosinergic signaling as a shared link between ketamine and ECT supports the rapid speed of neuroplastic response.

Risks and Unknowns

Despite their efficacy, both treatments have distinct tolerability profiles. ECT is associated with cognitive side effects, while ketamine may cause transient dissociative symptoms. High relapse rates further emphasize the necessity for maintenance therapy. Long-term safety and efficacy data remain limited, necessitating further research to optimize treatment protocols.

Looking Forward

As ketamine and ECT are complementary rather than competing tools, therapeutic choices must be tailored to individual patient profiles. Future research should focus on refining maintenance strategies and exploring the long-term impact of these treatments on neuroplasticity and overall mental health outcomes.

Primary source: https://openalex.org/W7201879275 — referenced for fact-checking; this analysis is independent commentary by the The Psychedelic Journal editorial team.
Found this useful?

Get tomorrow's briefing in your inbox

Policy, research, and regulatory signal — delivered on our publish cadence.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.